without disabling comorbidity (e.g., frailty, marked obesity (BMI >40 kg/m2), PAD, COPD, or orthopedic limitations) and capable of performing ADLs or able to achieve ≥5 METs and
Abnormal ST changes on resting ECG, digoxin, LBBB, Wolff-Parkinson- White pattern, ventricular paced rhythm (unless test is performed to establish exercise capacity and not for diagnosis of ischemia)
Unable to achieve ≥5 METs or unsafe to exercise
High-risk unstable angina or AMI (<2 d) i.e., active ACS
Intermediate-risk ASx adults (including considering starting a vigorous exercise program), particularly when attention is paid to exercise capacity
Limited diagnostic accuracy
sensitivity ~60% & specificity ~70%
Avoid if pre-existing ECG abnormalities
What are you looking for?
See slide
Prognostic importance of functional capacity
Once > 10 METS your prognosis, regardless of whether you have CAD or not, is quite good)
Figure source: đź“„ Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood JE. Exercise Capacity and Mortality among Men Referred for Exercise Testing. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002;346(11):793-801. doi:10.1056/nejmoa011858
See 📄 Chang SM, Nabi F, Xu J, et al. Value of CACS Compared With ETT and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Predicting Long-Term Cardiac Outcome in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Patients at Low Risk for Coronary Disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2015;8(2):134-144. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.11.008